Tuesday, June 3, 2014

Name                       : Muhammad Shomdani                                               Nim                    : 14121310324
Class/Semester        : PBI-b/4                                                                       Lecture               : Writing Academic 4
Should West Papua Separate from Indonesia?
1.      Introduction
            Through this argumentative essay, I argue that West Papua should be defended in the  integration with Indonesia, even though they have a several differences each other such as in political, anthropology, and history, but Indonesia had struggled West Papua from the Netherland. It is real that West Papua is included in Indonesia because of three terms, the first is if the terms of the political, that is based on an international agreement in 1896 that championed by Prof. Van Vollen Houven (Indonesian customary law experts) agreed that "Indonesia" is the former Dutch East Indies. While the West Papua though said by the Dutch in contrast to the tribal people of Indonesia, but it is legally a Dutch East Indies. The second is if the terms of anthropology, that Indonesia is the original Homo sapiens Soloensis Wajakensis and having the characteristics: black, curly hair (austromelanesoid race) which is a characteristic feature of the Aboriginal tribes (Australia) and the negro race (Papua). And the third is when viewed in terms of history that the Round Table Conference is being done to regulate the transfer of sovereignty Indonesia tinged with sly Dutch businesses who want to continue to maintain the West Papua on the grounds of ethnicity. Finally, the RTC decided the settlement of the West Papua will be determined within one year after the transfer of sovereignty through negotiations between the RIS with the Kingdom of the Netherlands.[1]
2.      Body Paragraph
There are four major things that West Papua want to be independent, those are:
            First, Problems of Papua within the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (Republic of Indonesia) have occurred since the beginning of the integration of Papua into the Republic of Indonesia. Forced integration process through referendum (PEPERA) in 1969 is not really fair because it involves only 1,045 people. So, referendum is not included by all Papuans. In fact the irony, almost all participants PEPERA are conditioned to choose to join the Homeland.[2]
            Second, after the problem of integration, the next phase is military and intelligence operations to destroy the Papuans who has another ideology. Community groups are trying to voice for justice in the land of Papua systematically destroyed. On behalf of the integrity of the Republic, murder, disappearances and rape against the people of Papua are legalized.[3]
            Third, the next phase is the exploitation of natural resources and transmigration. Natural resources, especially forest products, marine products, mining and petroleum are dredged. At the same time, for reasons of equity residents, thousands of people were brought to Papua through transmigration. Exploitation of natural resources in Papua continues, while humans Papua neglected even forgotten. As a result, after 43 years (1969-2012) of Papua human remains underdeveloped. Even the residents and those who dwell in the land of Papua are listed as the poorest man in Indonesia. The irony is not acceptable to common sense, because Papua is famous as the richest islands in Indonesia, even in the entire universe, but the populations live in poverty. [4]
            Fourth, the next phase is the failure of special autonomy, especially in the field of development of economic welfare, health and education. This has been said by Vice Chairman of Commission I, Tubagus Hasanuddin. [5]
The Motive of Soekarno and Soeharto
            Sukarno motive maintain nationalist political Irian Jaya, rid the west of the territory of Indonesia, making friends with the Soviet and Chinese communists. What is the difference between the positions of Indonesia during the old order (in the 1960s) with the position of Iran after the 1979 revolution? Not much different. Iranian society is very anti-western United States in particular. On the other hand, Iran also does the same with Indonesia, friends with communist Russia and China. Suharto motive struggle Irian Jaya from the Dutch is materialistic, for instance after a political deal with Freeport, CIA, the U.S. government, G30S/PKI design, and Supersemar.[6]
The Real History of West Papua
            After Indonesian independence was proclaimed on August 17, 1945 with a "State Jurisdiction" in which include the former of Dutch royal colony. It is legally recognized by the outside world and the establishment of the Republic of Indonesia from Sabang to Merauke. In fact it turns out the history of the other, because the area of Irian Jaya was still controlled by the Dutch government, albeit through a few times until the agreement with Conference Roundtable (RTC) in the Hague 1949di the Netherlands and as a result Indonesia received while setting the position of West Irian by the Netherlands for a period of one year. And this provision was not met by the Government, which Irian Jaya still not returned to the Government of Indonesia.
            But the struggle to restore Irian Jaya between 1950 and 1953 continue to be made, particularly through bilateral negotiation table within the Indonesian Union ties - Netherlands. After those efforts proven to bring results, then since 1953 the West Irian Liberation struggle underway at international forums, particularly the United Nations and the Asian Solidarity Forum = Africa such as the Asian - African Conference. Business in the diplomacy did not bring results, so the government began to take a hard stance against the Netherlands. Cancellation Indonesian Union - followed by the Dutch in 1954 unilateral cancellation by the RTC approval Indonesia in 1956.
            The struggle to restore Irian Jaya is now based on the strength of the Indonesian people themselves. From the results of this struggle also spawned constitution number 15 of 1956, concerning the establishment of West Irian struggle by the Cabinet Ali Satroamidjojo, Moh.Roem and Idam Chalik. The formation of this struggle province more emphasis on the basis of the administration, and the support of the people of Indonesia. To further confirm that West Irian was part of the Republic of Indonesia, then given the opportunity to people of West Irian to participate in government. So, in August 1956 the Indonesian government raised three People House members as representatives of the people of New Guinea; they are: Silas Papare, Mohamad Padang and AB Karubuy. However, the struggle of West Irian, although government officials have a Governor, Council of Governments and other agencies, stayed until the end of his life.
            The struggle to restore West Irian did not bring any results, because the Dutch are strikingly set up a "Council of Papua" on April 5, 1961, which was followed by the establishment of "State of Papua" regardless of the Republic of Indonesia. So the Indonesian government was forced to increase its confrontation in the military field. This shows the seriousness of the Indonesian government to liberate West Irian from the Dutch by force of arms. Right on the date of December 19, 1961 at Jokyakarta President Sukarno as the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces issued a Tri- People (TRIKORA). Having implemented the Act, the Act of Deliberation Council announced that the people unanimously decided Irian Jaya Irian remain part of the Republic Indonesia. These results brought Ambassador Ortiz Sanz to be reported in the UN General Assembly to 24 in November 1969. Since then the de yure Irian Jaya legitimate belong RI.[7]
Comprehensive Solution and Intervention of America for the Free Papua Movement
            From several policies that the government of Indonesia gives to the Papuan, they have not changed them anymore in the development of economic welfare, health, and education. According to Sinar Harapan there is a proper solution which capable to reduce the conflict in Papua, that is by comprehensive solution. [8]In particular, the government should not be afraid involving Papuans who joined the Free Papua Movement (OPM). Be aware that no matter how good government policy can not resolve the Papua conflict if not consult with OPM. OPM consists of three groups, namely first is the Papuans who fight in cities and villages, second is they are guerrilla in the jungle by the name of West Papua National Liberation Army (TPN PB), and third is the Papuan people who live abroad. All three of these groups should be involved in the discussion of all comprehensive solution. 
            Government needs to encourage them to meet, discuss, and formulate collective views of a comprehensive policy for the resolution of the Papua conflict. Thus, the comprehensive solution for Papua is searched and determined collectively, and acceptable to all stakeholders, including the OPM.
            In additionally, the conflicts that are always happened in West Papua actually on the basis of the intervention of America people. A source in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs reveals the intense efforts of some members of the U.S. Congress from the Democratic Party to the Free Papua Movement (OPM) to assist the process towards independence Papua gradually. Truly, Papua is the next target for America to be vanquished and dominated after Libya and the Middle East. This has been revealed by military analysts Connie Rahakundini Bakrie that the scenario of U.S. attacked Libyan and the Middle East has been designed from the first. Because all of these countries have the large petroleum resources, even Connie adds that the next U.S. target is Papua! Connie releases the statement on AFP Saturday 26/3 2011 is not without basis. The news of Papua became the next target of the U.S. have been circulating in intelligence circles. [9]
3.      Conclusion
            In Conclusion, by looking at the current state of Papua, Papuan independence will not guarantee that Papua will develop better than it is now, and there is no guarantee that leaders will have the vision to power the Papuan people's welfare. The governments of Indonesia can find the reasons for demanding the independence of Papua and on the other hand, we also have reasons to keep Papua as part of the Homeland. Hopefully the readers can weigh themselves on both sides of this, and judge from the high price of an independence from both of Papua and Indonesia’s standpoint. But regardless of the valuation readers, it is a good opinion that the Indonesian government needs to straighten out irregularities that occurred in the history of the integration of Papua into the Republic of Indonesia.
References:





[1]http://BLOGSEJARAHPERJUANGANBANGSAINDONESIAMEREBUTIRIANBARATPAPUA.htm
[5] http://EmpatHalPenyebabKonflikBerlarutdiPapuaTribunnews.com.htm
[8] http://MencariSolusiuntukKonflikPapua.htm
[9] http://indocropcircles.wordpress.com/2012/06/11/setelah-libya-target-as-selanjutnya-adalah-papua.htm

0 comments:

Post a Comment