Introduction
Many of the points that I want to be
said here is my intention to criticize the article titled Howard Zinn Speaking
truth to power with books, on view Zinn on Columbus, a lot of the points that I
want said here, the first being unmasked lies Zinn facts about the discoverer
of the Americas , the second is why Zinn does not open the actual fact that the
Muslims, the third why Columbus went to india. Paradigm of Columbus was supported by another opinion,
Samuel Eliot Morison, the Harvard historian not lie about Columbus. Morison
wrote a book with "Christopher Columbus, Mariner, written in 1954".
Morison wrote about slavery and murder in the brutal policies in the shade of
Columbus, are all summed up in one word, is "genocide".
Summary
As
Howard
Zinn
wrote
in his
People's
History of the
United States
who
exposes
American inventor
truth,
many
people
who
do not
believe
and
blaspheme
him.
The intent of
these
writings
is
to
tell the
truth
of
who the
real
inventor
of the American continent.
His writings
are
considered
radical
by
most Americans
due to the
paradigm
that have been
stopped
in
their
minds
that
Columbus
the
American inventor,
basis
without
consciousness.
They
do not
even
believe
less confident
about the content
of
the text.
So, why
most people
reject
the truth
for the
Zinn
book,
Howard
Zinn
describes
the power of
the book
or
not,
the people
who
respond.
because
the strength of
the book
that
can
change the world. Zinn
papers
criticized
by
Sam
Winebrug
in his article titled
Undue
Certainty
. Where
Howard
Zinn's
A People
of History
Falls
Short.
Sam
argues
that
"not only
is
Zinn
certain
about the
history
that's
happened.
He is
certain
about the
history
that
did
not
".
Professor
Oscar
Handlin
(Harvard
historian)
also
criticized the
Zinn
book,
he
hated
his book
Zinn
and
Zinn
simply
replied
"up,
historians like or dislike
my book
it
is based on
their perspective."
Can
be predicted
that
Howard
Zinn
wrote
that
he
recorded
in history
,
brainwash
Americans
that
Columbus
is not a
hero,
Howard
Zinn
was
a hero
carrying
the
evidence of the truth
of who
Columbus.
Zinn
did not make
criticism of
the pros
and cons.
Zinn
hold fast to the
doctrine
of Kurt
Vonnegut
"I
write
so you
would
know
there
are
people
who
feel
the way
you do
about the
world,
that
you
are not
alone". On 22 October 1494, began the second
expedition of Christopher Columbus , the Spanish sailors , to find new
territory . In this expedition , Columbus managed to find the Antilles archipelago
in the Atlantic Ocean .Antilles region include Cuba , Jamaica , Haiti , the Dominican
Republic , Puerto Rico, and others .Columbus in his first expedition which took
two months , from August to October 1492 , managed to discover America , but it
is thought that the discover of india. When the Spaniards landed on the new
continent of America , the people Indian greeted with great fanfare and
curiosity , they regaled the Spaniards with a variety of food and beverages as
well as an assortment of prizes , Columbus wrote it in record TSB brought us
parrots and balls of cotton and spears and many other things , that they want
to swap with glass beads and hawk bells ' . They are willing to give up
everything they have . They are well-built , with good bodies and handsome
features . They do not bear arms , and do not know guns , because I showed them
a sword , they hold the flair and injuring their own hands due to his ignorance
. They do not know the iron / iron . their spears are made of cane . They will
be a fine day slaves . With only fifty men , we could subjugate them all and make
them do whatever we want .
Critique
It is worthy of critics in the article and the book Howard Zinn why not open up the truth that Muslims who discovered America and the Zinn just open perspective and scrutinize the books of Samuel Elliot Morrison was not Columbus who discovered America, Howard Zinn actually know but still only cover this lie, and we can see from the background origins that Howard Zinn a Jewish and Jews are enemies of Muslims, which is why Howard Zinn did not want to open its validity because he hates islam.Memang actually criticize it should be accompanied by supporting sources as saying that not Columbus who discovered America but Muslims.
It is worthy of critics in the article and the book Howard Zinn why not open up the truth that Muslims who discovered America and the Zinn just open perspective and scrutinize the books of Samuel Elliot Morrison was not Columbus who discovered America, Howard Zinn actually know but still only cover this lie, and we can see from the background origins that Howard Zinn a Jewish and Jews are enemies of Muslims, which is why Howard Zinn did not want to open its validity because he hates islam.Memang actually criticize it should be accompanied by supporting sources as saying that not Columbus who discovered America but Muslims.
If
it is true that Columbus is not an American inventor , Howard Zinn is able to
explain who the real American inventor , whether the Arawak tribe , people will
believe it completely if the objection is accompanied by reasons and certainly
strong evidence . With strong evidence , would not want people to believe ,
especially in the western world there people are more likely to analytical . If
it could be rational and reasonable, then it can be they receive . Should when
Howard assumes that Columbus is just an imposter , he was able to replace the
position who deserve as American inventor that time . Is that Leif Ericson.
Viking sailor who ever set foot in the Americas before Columbus came . However
, because Leif is not a well-known figure , concerning discovery matters have
not been widespread , so does not leave any changes to America then he should
not be referred to as the inventor of the figure . Or Cheng Ho Or does Islam
figure Khashshash bin Said bin Aswad, Arawaks or fixed rate. Can answer many historical
narrative being the discovery of the evidence each equally the name of the
character in the sieve - sieve as the inventor. However , unfortunately, in the
historical narrative , this is not as bright as in the writing of the map .
Historian writes as if any reader has a single common interest . The particular
writers seemed to forget that the production of knowledge is a tool of combat
in the antagonism between social classes , races , nations or peoples .
Happenings that Columbus was the umpteenth time to set foot in America , a
cruel , pirates , rape other.
Conclution
Howard
Zinn
It turns out
that
the author
is less than perfect,
it is basically
every
author
that
wants to
provide
information
to
the
reader.
He
reveals the
problems
Columbus
but
did not
have
strong
evidence,
he
does not
want to reveal
the original
discoverer
of the America clearly
the
inventor
of Islam
because
he is
a Jew
who hates
Islam.
Reference
: Antrophology of the Shelf : Antrophology on Writing
https://www.google.com/search?q=kebohongan+howard+zinn+dalam+mengungkap+benua+amerika
0 comments:
Post a Comment